The senior managers at argonia studios inc. recognized a lack of employee enthusiasm about the new website. in fact there was a fair amount of infighting and accusations of who was responsible for the layout, given that the firm is considered to be highly competent in design and production. karen, a manager, got the team together and engaged them in a lively discussion to determine how to change the website so that it reflected more of argonia’s unique design ability. as the meeting wound down, each team member volunteered to take on a part of the project to fix the site. the ability to identify this problem and resolve it is an effective use of skills.

How did north carolina’s constitution of 1868 affect women and free blacks? a. they were given the right to vote b. they were excluded from participation in government c. they lost economic power d. they were able to hold office if they owned property

The year is 1776. the family of philosopher john locke has brought a lawsuit against thomas jefferson for copying locke's ideas. locke's family claim that jefferson's "declaration of independence" plagiarizes locke's ideas from two treatises on government. you are the judge ruling on the case. you must research how jefferson's ideas compare to locke's and determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of stealing locke's ideas. your paragraph opinion (a court document explaining how you arrived at your decision on a case) should contain the following: explain at least 2 ideas of jefferson and locke that are similar explain at least 1 idea of jefferson that is different from locke's determine whether or not jefferson is guilty of plagiarism explain why or why not ~~ you don't have to do the work for me but i really would like some with this, you ! ( if you would like to do it for me that's great too : )

Which best explains why the supreme court’s decision in plessy v. ferguson was unconstitutional? the supreme court’s ruling allowed states to deny equal protection to any person within its jurisdiction. since the 14th amendment did not make concessions for people born outside the us, the supreme court’s decision could not be applied. the supreme court’s decision gave individual states the freedom to make their own laws in relation to non-whites. since segregation laws did not provide equal protections or liberties to non-whites, the ruling was not consistent with the 14th amendment.