Using the drop-down menus, choose the correct word or phrase to correctly complete each sentence. the supreme court ruled in favor of the government used by preventing the new york times from printing the documents. the main result of the case was to

New York Times V. United States 1971

The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Times.

The government used the reasoning of national security by preventing The New York Times from printing the documents.

The main result of the case was that the government couldn't say that there was a danger to the United States if they couldn't prove it.

Explanation:

The correct choices for the following statements are as below -

1. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of New York Times.

2. The government used the battery of reasoning of the national security's interests by preventing the New York Times from printing the documents.

3. The main result of the case was to show and prove that there is no such things as a threat to the national security and does not necessarily interest the national government if such article is being published in the newspaper.

Hence, the correct set of choices that make the statement complete and match the statements appropriately are as given above.

To know more about the national security, click the link below.

link

michael joseph jackson was an american singer, songwriter, and dancer. dubbed the "king of pop", he is widely regarded as one of the most significant cultural figures of the 20th century and one of the greatest entertainers of all time.

brainliest

trade regulation is a field of law, often bracketed with antitrust (as in the phrase “antitrust and trade regulation law”), including government regulation of unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive business acts or practices. antitrust law is often considered a subset of trade regulation law. franchise and distribution law, consumer protection law, and advertising law are sometimes considered parts of trade regulation law.

in general the theory of economics says that the more open to trade a country is the better   the result for the same country and the whole economies.

in real life countries impose taxes, quotas, etc which is not so good for the economies.

this kind of commercial war between the usa and china is slowing down the growth of the whole world so we can say that it is a draw back of trade regulations. and the free trade agreements are benefits of trade regulations.