Paul plaintiff, a resident of texas, files a lawsuit in texas against don defendant, a resident of california. don receives notice of the lawsuit, and tells his lawyer, "i don't want to travel to texas to be sued by this guy." don's lawyer says, "maybe you don't have to." the lawyer argues that the texas court lacks personal jurisdiction over don. paul's lawyer asserts that the court does have personal jurisdiction, and that the case should proceed.
six months before, don travelled to texas, signed a contract with paul while he was there, and returned to california. he has made no other trips to texas, and has had no other interactions with the state.
in paul's lawsuit, he alleges that don has breached that contract.
which of the following types of personal jurisdiction does the texas court have over don?
a. general personal jurisdiction
b. specific personal jurisdiction
c. both a and b
d. none of the above