If a movement claims that the best way to reverse climate change is to reduce carbon emissions by outlawing privately owned cars, “outlawing cars” is the
prognostic framing
diagnostic framing
motivational framing
frame transformation

The correct answer is A. Prognostic framing

Explanation:

In sociology, social movements are commonly defined by three types of frames that are related to the perspective of individuals in relation to social and movements and reality. These frames include diagnostic framing in a problem or aspect to be changed is clear and has only one clear solution for individuals; prognostic framing in which the problem is stated along with a solution although there are more solutions considered by individuals and motivational framing in which the problem is directly linked to an action that needs to be carried out.

In the case individuals that are part of a movement claim there are different ways to solve a problem that is climate change which makes this frame different from diagnostic framing, but they propose one main solution that is outlawing privately owned cars and this does not directly call to action as in motivational framing and therefore "outlawing cars" is part of prognostic framing as options are considered and a solution is proposed without a direct action.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: