Answer it fastanswer it fast fast answer fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast fast

Please, get elaborate answer from Google pages on this subject. At that time some world famous political personalities first took the lead for forming non aligned nations which counts to 122 nations in 2012 and some observer nations. President Naser of Egypt, Fiedel Castro of Cuba, Sukarna from Indonesia and Pandit Nehru were the main initiater of its movement. They proposed not to be ally with or oppose big developed Nations, but they must voice their protest against all imperialist forces, neo colonial, indirect colonial rule and against economic colonialism

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

the correct answer is a