Social Studies, 02.07.2019 17:20 love123jones

Review the following factual scenario. a man entered into a lease for an apartment with a landlord. the lease stated that the term was month-to-month. after one month, the man while taking a shower, noticed the drywall crumbling. under the drywall was a build up of harmful mold. rather than informing the landlord, the man simply sealed off the bathroom area. he continued to reside in the apartment two monthswithout paying rent. when pressed for the rent, the man said that he was withholding the rent because the apartment was uninhabitable. further, the man went to the city health and licensing department and complained about hazardous mold condition which consituted a code violations that the landlord failed to correct. after an inspection, the agency cited the landlord for the presence of mold, and ordered him to clear up the violation. after the inspection, the landlord brought an eviction action against the man and obtained a judgment against him for eviction. will the eviction order hold up under the stated facts? was the man right to withhold the rent? what arguments, if any, may the landlord raise to avoid paying the code violations? under the circumstances, what is the most likely ruling of the court?

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00

Abasic premise of the national response framework is that: a. most incidents begin and end locally and are managed at the local or tribal level. b. response partners use nonstandard structures to allow for flexible and scalable responses. c. readiness to act encourages response partners to self-dispatch to an incident scene. d. incidents should be managed at the highest jurisdictional level possible.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:00

What is one main reason some governments in the twentieth century began campaigns of genocide? a) a minority group wanted total independence. b) a minority group wanted more say in lawmaking. c) a minority group had different cultural customs. d)a minority group protested against government policy.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 01:30

An artist entered into a written agreement to sell a patron a partially finished painting once it was complete. the patron later learned that the artist planned to sell the painting to a third party who offered to pay the artist more than the contract price. the patron filed suit to compel the artist to sell the painting to her in accord with the terms of their agreement, while the artist denied that the painting the artist planned to sell to the third party was the subject of the agreement with the patron. at trial, the patron did not introduce the written agreement or explain its absence. rather, the patron sought to testify that, when she signed the agreement, the artist had pointed to the painting in question and stated that it was the patronâ€™s painting. the artistâ€™s attorney objected to the testimony that the artist identified the painting as belonging to the patron. how should the court rule? asustain the objection, because the artistâ€™s statement was hearsay. bsustain the objection, because the patron failed to produce the written agreement or explain its absence. coverrule the objection, because the statement is not hearsay. doverrule the objection, because the statement was relevant.

Answers: 3

Answer

Social Studies, 22.06.2019 08:20

Name three things the framers of the constitution did to keep the federal government or any part of it from becoming too powerful.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Review the following factual scenario. a man entered into a lease for an apartment with a landlord....

Questions