Traverse county needs a new county government building that would cost $10 million. the politicians feel that voters will not approve a municipal bond issue to fund the building because it would increase taxes. they opt to have a state bank issue $10 million of tax-exempt securities to pay for the building construction. the county then will make yearly lease payments (of principal and interest) to repay the obligation. unlike conventional municipal bonds, the lease payments are not binding obligations on the county and, therefore, require no voter approval. required do you think the actions of the politicians and the bankers in this situation are ethical? in terms of risk, how do the tax-exempt securities used to pay for the building compared to a conventional municipal bond issued by traverse county?

Read this passage from the u.s. constitution: the congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the congress.3 based on the passage, which statement is true? a. the constitution cannot be changed, but congress and the states can call for a new constitution to be written. b. the process of changing the constitution requires broad support from both congress and the states. c. the constitution can be changed through a process that requires a simply majority vote in congress. d. changing the constitution is a difficult process that only the president can carry out

Which of the following statements most accurately describes the requirement for the documentation of minors’ assent to participate in research? parents must approve written documentation.documentation is required unless waived by an irb.to protect minors documentation is always required.federal regulations do not require the documentation of minors’ assent.

1. what was the premise behind the recording industry association of america’s lawsuit against napster? 2. based on your knowledge of how napster worked, if you downloaded a copy of a song from a friend’s hard drive using napster, would you be infringing on the musician’s or record company’s copyright? 3. describe the scope of the digital millennium copyright act and what or whom it protects. 4. what was the link between the digital millennium copyright act and the napster legal proceedings? 5. what are the legal implications of napster’s online music-sharing service?