Leslie bergh and his two brothers, milton and raymond, formed a partnership to build a fancy saloon and dance hall in evanston, wyoming. later, leslie met with his friend and drinking buddy, john mills, and tricked mills into investing in the saloon. leslie did not tell mills that no one else was investing cash or that the entire enterprise was already bankrupt. mills mortgaged his home, invested $150,000 in the saloon—and lost every penny of it. mills sued all three partners for fraud. milton and raymond defended on the grounds that they did not commit the fraud; only leslie did. the defendants lost. was that fair? by holding them liable, what general idea did the court rely on? what anglo-saxon legal custom did the ruling resemble?

Aresearcher conducting behavioral research collects individually identifiable sensitive information about illicit drug use and other illegal behaviors by surveying college students. the data are stored on a laptop computer without encryption, and the laptop computer is stolen from the researcher’s car on the way home from work. this is an unanticipated problem that must be reported because the incident was (a) unexpected (i.e., the researchers did not anticipate the theft); (b) related to participation in the research; and (c) placed the subjects at a greater risk of psychological and social harm from the breach in confidentiality of the study data than was previously known or recognized. according to ohrp, this unanticipated problem must be reported to the irb in which timeframe? promptlywithin 48 hourswithin 24 hourswithin two weeks

How can the judiciary balance individual rights with the common good?

How has congress added to the president’s role as chief economic planner over the years?