Ethical guidelines require that participation in research studies be voluntary. how might this ethical guideline be violated with the use of "captive audiences" of sociology students? in what ways can the researcher/professor reassure students that participation is strictly voluntary? explain your reasoning.

In writing about her findings in a brazilian shantytown, nancy scheper-hughes’s account of alto do cruzeiro provides a window into the terrible toll of nonconsensual organ harvesting among the poor, as well as how she herself changed over time. how might an anthropologist justify the publication of this ethnographic research when considering the problem of ethnographic authority? a. all of the poor must be given an equal voice, thus polyvocality is justification. b. anthropologists are themselves changed in fieldwork, and so honest reflexivity is justification. c. the horrific conditions made it impossible to ignore, and since she obtained informed consent, this is justification. d. authoritative writing asks us to consider what right we have to report, thus a moral challenge is justification.

What does the creature say is the reason for his bloodthirsty, fiendish behavior?

Acharacterized by intimate, long-term, face-to-face association and cooperation. primary group community clique secondary group