Adefendant was charged with battery, defined as at common law. at trial, an expert witness testified for the defense that the defendant, an athlete, was under the influence of a performance-enhancing drug at the time he committed the battery and that he would not have done so had he not been so influenced. the defendant asked for an instruction to the effect that if the jury believed that he was influenced by the drug at the time of the crime and would not have committed it otherwise, it had to acquit him. which of the following circumstances would most aid the defendant’s argument in favor of such an instrucion? a. evidence that the defendant is addicted to this drug and has an overwhelming urge to consume it. b. evidence that the defendant’s coach, who gave him the drug, told him it was only an aspirin. c. evidence that the victim of the assault taunted the defendant about his use of the drug immediately before the assault. d. expert testimony that a reasonable person, on consuming this drug, may experience uncontrollable rages.