The owner of a corner lot allowed a hedge on his property to become overgrown, obstructing the view of motorists at that corner. two motorists were driving inattentively and each ran a stop sign at the intersection bordering the lot. their cars collided in the intersection and one of the motorists was injured. she sued the owner of the lot. the jury determined that the lot owner was 10% at fault and each of the motorists was 45% at fault. will the injured motorist recover damages from the lot owner? a yes, because she was not more than 50% at fault. b yes, because it was foreseeable that motorists could be injured if the hedge was not cut back. c no, because the other motorist's negligence was a superseding cause of her injuries. d no, because the lot owner's fault was slight compared with the motorist's fault.