Amalia really wanted that new position at work and knew that in order to get it she would have to increase her skill set and shadow a fellow worker, stan, to learn some new processes. however, every time amalia decided that she had a few minutes to shadow stan she would get caught up in something else and the opportunity would pass. amalia's failure to shadow stan so far speaks to her

Amalia really wanted that new position at work and knew that in order to get it she would have to increase her skill set and shadow a fellow​ worker, Stan, to learn some new processes.​ However, every time Amalia decided that she had a few minutes to shadow Stan she would get caught up in something else and the opportunity would pass.​ Amalia's failure to shadow Stan so far speaks to her​ direction

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

what is the question?