To avoid the classic design mistake of “silver bullet syndrome,” the analyst should select one: a. increase the schedule to include learning time b. move proposed changes into future versions c. not switch or upgrade development tools unless there is a compelling need d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true e. use rapid application development techniques or timeboxing

d. not use a design tool that appears too good to be true

Explanation:

Silver Bullet Syndrome defined as the belief that the next drastic change in  tools, resources or procedures will put an end to all the problems that exist within a company. According to my research on the silver bullet syndrome, I can say that based on the information provided within the question the analyst should not use a design tool that appears too good to be true. Since designs like this that provide miraculous solutions are always false or wrong.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

i'll just take the points xd

the question deals with financial planning and the answer is that dan did not stay on budget due to the fact that this guy needs to start decreasing his discretionary spending. according to the financial plan, he needed to balance his expenses and resources.