Reality consists of objects that have properties independent of any people or other beings who experience them. a rock would still be a separate, hard object even if no one existed in the universe to observe it and experience its hardness. true or false?

True

Explanation:

A common definition of Reality is what we perceive with our senses, however, electrons, atoms or feelings are also real but no one can sense them. That is why something is called real even if there is no one somehow perceiving that thing. Reality does not depends on people or devises created to measure.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

no, dan should reduce his discretionary spending. not long-term goals involve more planning than short-term goals do