There is considerable controversy over federal tax policy. suppose a presidential candidate proposed a policy that eliminated mandatory income taxes and allowed people to contribute as much tax money as they would like. why is this plan unfeasible?

citizens will decide not to contribute at all

Explanation:

According to my research on various economic studies, I can say that based on the information provided within the question this plan is unfeasible because individual citizens have no immediate visible effect on tax implementations. In other words no individual's contribution to tax revenue is critical to whether the government is capable of providing public goods, so citizens do not have an incentive to contribute. Therefore the most likely effect of this policy would be that citizens will decide not to contribute at all.

I hope this answered your question. If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

forty niners migrated west due to gold discovery in california and it the west was a new place for hope this : )

explanation:

facts: the 14th amendment

the 14th amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws.

the 14th amendment was intended to protect the rights of former slaves after the american civil war.

the 14th amendment was approved by congress in june of 1866 and ratified by the states on july 9, 1868.

the 14th amendment establishes that all persons born in the united states are citizens and are guaranteed all the rights of citizenship.

the 14th amendment establishes that the law protects all citizens equally.

in this case the passage of the 14th amendment   that was violated was the last part in which it states that there is equal protection of the law.