When using the "intimidation" tactic to detect deception, one should select one: a. emphasize the futility and impending danger associated with continued deceit. b. lie to the other to make them believe you have uncovered their deception. c. play down the significance of any deceptive act. d. make a "no-nonsense" accusation of the other. e. none of the above actions would be used as part of the intimidation tactic.

d. make a "no-nonsense" accusation of the other.

Explanation:

Bullying tactics are emotional devices that play into one's insecurities through false accusations that divert the focus of the debate. They are designed to get the public drawn to the accuser's point of view and to demonize their opponent with inconvenient truths or false accusations. In most, if not all cases, intimidation tactics are basically ad hominem attacks.

Based on this, we can say that the letter D is the correct answer to your question.

omg stop xd you need to chi

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.