Itried to go back in the book and found nothing! i need with all of them

The defendant and an accomplice were on trial together for burglary. both had given confessions implicating themselves and their accomplice. at trial, the defendant maintained that his confession had been obtained through improper coercion by the police. for the purpose of countering the claim of coercion, the prosecution seeks to place the accomplice’s confession into evidence. after objection by the defendant’s counsel, the judge agrees to issue a limiting instruction to the jury that the confession is to be considered only with regard to the question of whether the defendant’s confession was coerced. may the accomplice’s confession be admitted under that condition?

Use your map on page 347 to find europe (hint: there is a smaller map on the bottom of that page that shows you specifics! ) name three countries in europe. *

Compare and contrast the methods of argument that pertelote and chanticleer use to defend their interpretation of dreams. what is false about each of their arguments?