Which sentence must be revised to eliminate the preposition at the end? if no one answers the door, then let yourself in. the top steps are fine, but be careful of the slippery stairs below. where are katelyn and ella walking to? do you know what naveen was talking about?

The top steps are fine, but be careful of the slippery stairs below.

Explanation:

In this case, there was a mistake in the noun stairs, or the final preposition below must be removed. Two possible correct options are:

The sentence that must be revised to eliminate the preposition at the end is the top steps are fine, but be careful of the slippery stairs below.

Explanation:

Option B is the one that can be revised since it has two nouns steps and stairs and it is talking about two different things so it does not need the preposition to make the comparison between up and down. The other options need the preposition so they do not affect the meaning of it, in option A "let in" is a separable phrasal verb and it needs both parts to be grammatically correct, options C and D are preposition questions which have the characteristic of closing with a necessary preposition, "walk to" expresses direction and "talk about" refers to the specific topic.

the first option is correct

mark me brainliest

~courtney

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.