In the case of railway express v. new york (1949), the supreme court upheld a new york city ban forbidding advertising on commercial vehicles. this new york city ordinance applied to some distracting vehicles, but not all. the court ruled that the city ordinance had a legitimate purpose and goal. what standard was being applied in this case?

the rational basis test

Explanation:

Government Responses to Discrimination. The rational basis test is the lowest-level standard that the Supreme Court uses to assess the constitutionality of a law. Intermediate scrutiny is the middle-level standard and strict scrutiny is the highest-level standard. When using the rational basis test, the Court presumes the law is constitutional as long as there is a reasonable link between the means and the goals of the law.

another answer from our community: let us first explain the meaning of "eternal truth" which is tomean, continuing forever or indefinitely. this being the case itcannot be changed, for truth is truth no matter what changes aremade to the structure of its explanation. however, as for religeons changin… (more)

usually, however, secession was popular enough without the of community leaders. prominent unionists, on the other hand, were a major reason that texas did not secede before march 1861. the most important of these was sam houston, the governor of the state from 1859 to 1861.

can i have brainlest