Joe sends for a mba catalog from state university. according to the catalog, the mba applications are evaluated on the basis of undergraduate grades, gmat (the appropriate standardized test) scores, references, and other factors that the university, in its discretion, believes will enhance the standing of the university. joe has a 3.1 gpa, scores very well on the gmat, and has excellent references. based on the criteria listed in the catalog, joe applies and pays the $100 application fee. his application is rejected. later he finds out that others with low grades and test scores were accepted based on their family connections with the university. if joe followed all of the guidelines in the college catalog and paid the required application fee, then according to the court in steinberg v. chicago medical school:

In a property settlement after a divorce, the wife was awarded all personal property that had been accumulated during the marriage, including the husband's classic 19-inch black-and-white tv set. in order to get his prized tv set back, the husband lied to his friend, telling him that the wife took the tv set in violation of the property settlement. the friend remembered that the wife gave the friend's wife a key to her new home, and he volunteered to go with the husband to get the tv back while the wife was at work. the husband and the friend went to the wife's house, but, unbeknownst to them, the wife had taken the day off work. after the friend noisily opened the back door with his wife's key, the wife called the police, who quickly arrived and arrested the husband and the friend. as to a charge of common law conspiracy to commit larceny, how should the friend be found?