A20 year-old female who returned from spring break in mexico six days ago, presents to the ed with a high fever for three days, a sore throat, general aches and a miserable cough. the ed provider suspects flu and orders a rapid flu test. what icd-10-cm code(s) is reported?

Code J11.1 is reported.

Explanation:

The ICD 10 ES is an international classification manual of diseases where the classification of each of the diseases identified today is found.

For each of the diseases, there is a code, which lists the different symptoms that the condition can have.

For example, the flu:

Influenza, influenza (bronchial) (epidemic)

(respiratory) (upper) (influenza virus no

identified) J11.1

- with

- - J11.81 encephalopathy

- - J11.2 enteritis

- - J11.1 pharyngitis

- - J11.2 gastroenteritis

- - upper respiratory infection (acute) NCOC J11.1

As you can see in the example, the coding depends on each of the symptoms that the person presents.

I hope this information can help you.

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

as university of miami psychologists debra lieberman and adam smith pointed out in a recent article in the journal current directions in psychological science, humans have social and psychological mechanisms to deter incest. with very few exceptions, marriages between brothers and sisters and between parents and their children are verboten in every human culture. the primary psychological anti-incest mechanism is the yuck response. even the idea of sex with their mom or dad, bro or sis is upsetting to most people. the psychologist jonathan haidt has found that nearly everyone is repelled by the prospect of brother-sister sex, even in hypothetical situations in which there is no chance of pregnancy).

the biological cost of incest

this raises an interesting question: just what’s so bad about incest? sure, having sex with your dad or your sister seems gross — but why? some anthropologists have argued that incest taboos are learned social conventions. this explanation, however, doesn’t make sense to me as it does not explain the widespread existence of anti-incest mechanisms in creatures ranging from cockroaches to chimpanzees. second, the incest taboo is about as close to a universal law as human moral rules get.

why should mechanisms to avoid incest be so widespread both in nature and across human societies? the answer is simple. the problem with having sex close with relatives is that there is an astonishingly high chance that your offspring will be born with a serious birth defect.