Which of the following is true about the special education category of emotional disturbance (ed)?
education is the only field which uses the category of emotional disturbance (ed).
children and youth can be excluded from services for ed if they are determined to be "socially maladjusted."
children with schizophrenia can be served in schools under the ed label.
all of the above.

Children and youth can be excluded from services for ED if they are determined to be "socially maladjusted."

Explanation:

What is the definition of emotional disturbance?

According to the federal law the official definition of emotional disturbance is the situation in which the performance of a child in education has been greatly impacted by the following: (1) they are not able to learn and there is no explanation to why they are not able to learn (2) They have issue making relationship with others or relating in normal way with people around them , (3)They behave inappropriately and display their feeling inaccurately (4) unhappiness/depression, or (5) they also display psychological imbalance

However federal law state that children who only have issues with following rules or who break rules those are said to be socially maladjusted and they can not be included under emotional disturbance category.

The difference between the two is that socially maladjusted children decide not to abide by the given behaviour standards whilst emotionally disturbed children do not possess the mental state to follow the given behavioural standards even if they want to.

Some do argue though against this saying that even socially maladjusted kids do have some signs that are counted under emotional disturbance so it could probably be more effective theorically than practically.

soothing tone) but quickly, the tone changes from a light tone to a grim one. by introducing disturbing word choices that are illogical.make a list of some of levertov’s images of war from both of her poems. how do her wordsaffect you? do you agree with her position on war? write a short response (at least 100 words) and support your answer with personal experience or your studiespoets can change the tone in a poem, and levertov does when the she refers to "delicate man . .whose eyes/are flowers that perceive the stars”. the word choices here are different. theimages began to show feelings of hope/potential. but this mood is interrupted with the dark oppressive words "entrails of still-alive babies" and "carcass-gulleys". levertov continues to switch tones by "the deep intelligence living at peace would have"—one is left with a sense of hope. i can connect with her words that humans can do better things than fight in war. we only have one life so dying in a war would be for no reason. also, i am a christian and in the bible, it says "thou shall not kill", and i strongly believe in that.people respond differently to satire—some like it, others don't get it. in at least 150 words, describe what you think of goines's narrative essay. discuss whether you think his position is convincing.the satire kept people's attention, rather than just rambling. instead of being dead serious, he adds humor to enlighten it. i think he did a good job of proving his point, but convincing people to stray from their own beliefs is hard, and satire can be offensive to that person. overall i think that goines's narrative essay was good because narrative essay create deeper understanding. i also like that the narrative essay is in first-person. the essay was filled with diction and word choice to let you know that the essay is going to be witty yet satirical. his point was to write  

explanation: