Iwill give brainilist! submit your answers to the two test questions in the question spaces below. if you'd like, you can type your answers into a word document, and then copy and paste them here if you prefer to save your answers for future revision on later attempts. want a document template? use this : ) unit 3 part 2 written response. docx

you can find an organizer to you with your answers here: history 7 unit 3 part 2 graphic organizer use this to plan your writing

question 1 (6 points)
describe how sumer met at least three criteria of a civilization. use specific examples.

question 2 (6 points)
how did the geography of mesopotamia contribute to the development of early civilization there?

1. A surplus of food, work share and creating colonies.

2. Mesopotamia was in an area that was harsh and unpredictable.

Hey there! Great question!

Sumer met the criteria of a cilvilization because of their cities, like Ur, Uruk and Kish, they're surplus of food, due to their irrigation system and their division of labor, otherwise known as jobs.

The Tigris and Euphrates river both placed a huge part in how the development of Mesopotamian civilization begun.The rivers were able to basically stretch itself towards the farmlands. The farmers could use the water and it led to the construction of canals, aqueducts etc. That then eventually led to a cilvilization.

Hope this helped! Put this in your own words!

if interdependence implies a two-way dependence, and if each partner is equally dependent on the other for success, then there is an equal commitment to the making the partnership successful. the advantage is sustainability of the relationship, the disadvantage is that decisions are "democratic" and therefore may take longer to reach and more likely to be a compromise (which is not always the best solution). as the interdependence moves away from equality, the decisions become more influenced by the more independent partner. in the extreme the relationship becomes more dictatorial and more like "master-slave". generally the relationship has less commitment in both directions and is more likely to be temporary.

if one generalizes (and one shouldn't), equity partnerships, which is probably what is implied by interdependence, can be slow to progress or change but durable. the extreme alternative, independent-dependent partnerships tend to be efficient but more fragile.

hope this but you will have to site your own evidence. : )

answer; the population in brazil is very diverse there are many races and ethnic groups