Rachel finished her oral exam in her spanish class, and her teacher señora lopez evaluated her performance. although rachel did well on the exam, and most of señora lopez's comments were positive, rachel focused only on the negative critiques and felt very bad about her performance. rachel just engaged in which of the following behaviors? group of answer choicesa. pseudolistening
b. content-oriented listening
c. selective attention
d. negative attention bias

selective attention

Explanation:

Selective attention is a brain ability that selects important information and ignores irrelevant information. The selected information will appear clearer and more intense, and is chosen according to the subject's interest and meaning most of the time unconsciously. An example of this can be seen in the question above, where Rachel was so concerned about doing poorly on her Spanish test that her brain believed that only the negative comments her teacher made about her test were relevant. Rachel's brain selected the teacher's positive comments as irrelevant and eventually ignored them. As a result Rachel focused only on the negative reviews and felt very bad for her acting.

in this part of the declaration it refers to the point when american people didn't recognize the british domain and   breaks the political bands with britain, they forced a respectful separation.

mankind was created and entitled equally with rights   which were life, freedom and the seeking for happiness.

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.