For people who live near a bus route, a subway station, or a commuter rail line, public transportation provides a substitute to driving their own cars. so, for these people, the cross-price elasticity of demand between gasoline and public transportation

In this mentioned case we can determine that the cross-price elasticity of demand in this case is positive.

Explanation:

Cross-price elasticity of demand measures the responsiveness of the quantity demanded for a good to a change in the price of another good. If the gasoline price increase, the demand for public transportation will increase so the balance is positive.

So, for these people, the cross-price elasticity of demand between gasoline and public transportation is positive

Explanation:

What Is Cross Elasticity of Demand?

The cross elasticity of demand is a term used in economics to measure how people respond in the quantity demand of one good when the other good has its price changed .

The calculation is done by taking the percentage of the quantity demanded for the other good over the percentage change in price of the other good.

For example if the price of the apples is increased people may consider the alternative such as pears so the quantity of pears demanded will increase.

In the case above let us say gasoline price increases people has an alternative of using public transport; as the gasoline price increases the demand for public transport increases.

its b i looked it up hope u get it right wish u luck

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.