subject
Social Studies, 31.10.2019 00:31 jaymoria16

Several merchants signed a binding arbitration agreement with american express co. the arbitration agreement included a clause prohibiting class action arbitration. later, after a serious dispute arose involving a federal statute, the merchants wanted to pursue class action arbitration against american express arguing that it would be too expensive to pursue the claims individually. assuming the federal arbitration act applies, how should a court rule on the issue? a)the court should strike the whole arbitration agreement because a claim under federal law is involved, and the parties should be required to go to court for any relief.
b)the court should uphold the arbitration agreement itself and uphold the class action provision but limit any class action proceeding to no more than 20 plaintiffs.
c)the court should uphold the arbitration agreement itself and uphold the class action provision but limit any class action proceeding to no more than 10 plaintiffs.
d)the court should uphold the arbitration agreement itself but strike the provision prohibiting class action arbitration.
e)the court should uphold the agreement prohibiting class action arbitration.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 13:30
The biggest component / ingredient of summer time smog is
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 20:10
Which action would the president's political party most likely take to resolve this issue
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 21:50
Cooperation among oligopolies runs counter to the public interest because it leads to underproduction and high prices. in an effort to bring resource allocation closer to the social optimum, public officials attempt to force oligopolies to compete instead of cooperating. consider the following scenario: suppose that the presidents of two auto manufacturing companies exchange text messages in which they discuss jointly raising prices on their new lines of hybrid suvs. this illegal communication would violate which of the following laws? the sherman antitrust act of 1890 the robinson–patman act of 1936 the celler–kefauver act of 1950 the clayton act of 1914
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 23:00
The were so closely connected to the tang dynasty that korean elites used chinese as their written language. they set up a statewide academy that trained government officials in the philosophy of .
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Several merchants signed a binding arbitration agreement with american express co. the arbitration a...
Questions
question
Biology, 10.10.2019 16:30
question
Physics, 10.10.2019 16:30
question
Chemistry, 10.10.2019 16:30
question
Biology, 10.10.2019 16:30
Questions on the website: 13722367