Check my work (no more tries available) transpac corp. and alliance, inc., agree to a contract that includes an arbitration clause. after a dispute arises, the case goes to arbitration. the arbitrator finds in transpac's favor. alliance files a lawsuit, alleging that the award should not be enforced because the arbitrator made an error in her findings of fact. the court will likely:

the court will most likely do nothing

Explanation:

Based on the information presented in the passage in regards to the situation at hand it can be said that the court will most likely do nothing. This is because the arbitrator (which is a court official) already closed the case, if there was an error in her findings of fact they needed to be presented or disputed during the case, since once the verdict is given it is final.

If you have any more questions feel free to ask away at .

2b2t

explanation:

2b2t

this headline suggests that midterm congressional   elections are at the corner and trump administration wants to activate his base by vowing to clamp down on immigrants and immigration as trump had said during his election campaign around two years ago. when a baby is born in usa, the baby becomes citizen of usa for 85 years and trump wants to end this rule of birthright citizenship to control illegal immigration and this what he said in an interview""we’re the only country in the world where a person comes in and has a baby, and the baby is essentially a citizen of the united states for 85 years, with all of those benefits,” "