Apolitical cartoon that depicts president andrew johnson as a king sitting upon a throne is shown. johnson is surrounded by a handful of loyal subjects. in the background of the image, a line of people are shown waiting to put their head on a chopping block. a man is showing kneeling on the ground and resting his head on the chopping block. a man holding an ax above his head prepares to swing it down on the head of the kneeling man. the cartoon reads, how he will look. what he will do. king andy i. long live king andy i. do you want andrew johnson president or king? you pays your taxes and you takes your choice. johnson as king supported by seward and welles. in the distance henry ward beecher, wendell phillips, charles sumner, and other abolitionists are formed in line for execution.
© getty images/image quest 2012

based on this cartoon, which of the following conclusions can be drawn about andrew johnson's approach to reconstruction?

he was open to hearing and implementing other group's ideas in his reconstruction plans.
he supported lenient treatment of the south and its people in rebuilding the region.
he demanded that his ideas for reconstruction be followed and ignored others' advice for rebuilding the region.
he strongly supported abolitionists and their movement to change the way of life in southern states.

The 2nd largest river in europe (that runs through 12 countries) is the river. question 13 options: rhine danube seine thames

Aplaintiff filed a civil action based on negligence against a defendant in federal district court, alleging that the defendant negligently ran a red light at an intersection and collided with the plaintiff's vehicle, causing the plaintiff's injuries. a week after the close of discovery, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the issue of whether the defendant was negligent. with the motion, the plaintiff filed (i) his own sworn affidavit, which stated that the traffic signal was green as he entered the intersection, (ii) an affidavit of a witness who was driving the car behind him, which stated that the witness saw the entire incident and that the plaintiff's traffic signal was green as he approached and entered the intersection; and (iii) an affidavit of another witness, which stated that she saw the entire incident and that the defendant's signal had been red for several seconds before the defendant entered the intersection and was still red when the defendant entered the intersection. the defendant filed a response to the motion, noting that her answer denied negligence and further denied that her traffic signal was red, and argued that the issue of negligence and the issue of whether her traffic signal was red were in dispute, so those issues should be tried to a jury. how should the court rule on the plaintiff's motion?

Based on the text why did another christian church appeal to european princes?