The move to opportunity (mto) study of the 1990s was the converse of the negative income tax of the 1960s and 1970s. the mto study changed families’ but not their whereas the negative income tax experiments did the reverse. together, the results of these studies suggest that based on economic circumstance is a bigger source of social problems than itself.

The Move to Opportunity (MTO) study of the 1990s was the converse of the negative income tax of the 1960s and 1970s. The MTO study changed families’ 1) locations but not their 2) incomes, whereas the negative income tax experiments did the reverse. Together, the results of these studies suggest that 3 ) social division based on economic circumstance is a bigger source of social problems than 4) income inequality itself.

Explanation:

is there a answer choice?

panem is a communist totalitarian dictatorship where all the resources and how they are allocated belongs to the capitol. the districts exist only to provide goods and services for the capital and most of the citizens live in poverty. it is a police state where the "peacekeepers" use force and threats to keep the people under control. dissent is outlawed and those who disobey the law are executed, flogged, or turned into avoxes. the games are another means in which the ruling elite in the capitol exert their power over the districts. when reading the books i drew parallels between panem and the soviet union and north korea. in no way is panem capitalist. the people in the capitol are wealthy but the majority of them are involved in the government somehow. it was the same way in the former soviet union where bigwigs in the communist party and high ranking government officials were given access to goods, services, medical treatments not available to the general public. if you think panem has a capitalist economy you need to brush up on your economics.