Alawyer represents a defendant in a drug smuggling case. the defendant is in pretrial custody in a distant city and cannot be reached by telephone. one key issue in the defendant's case is on the cutting edge of search and seizure law, and the lawyer believes that he needs to deal with the issue competently. the lawyer's former law professor is a nationally known expert on search and seizure law, but is not licensed to practice law in that state. the lawyer calls his former professor to ask for and also asks that the professor keep their conversation confidential. to frame the issue accurately, the lawyer tells the law professor some information that the defendant revealed to the lawyer in confidence. the lawyer does not tell the professor the name of his client. is the lawyer subject to discipline for disclosing the defendant's confidential information to the professor?

The lawyer is subject to discipline for disclosing the defendant's confidential information to the professor.

Explanation:

Confidentiality is the basic principle of legal ethics. Lawyers who obtain information at represent a client are required to keep the secret (in the absence of the customer consent to be disclosed). If a lawyer obtains information from a client who, if disclosed, would avoid that another person is wrongly convicted of manslaughter and sentenced to death, must keep silent, even if revealing that information does not involve the client in the crime.

The lawyers who violate the rule of Confidentiality are subject to sanctions, which may include disqualification to exercise your Profession and demands for malpractice.

Lawyers are not the only people in society to whom information is entrusted secret Friends, couples, family and business partners, among many others, also get private information, often with the express or implied agreement that it will be maintained confidential. Undoubtedly, these other groups also face the occasional dilemma of maintaining Confidentiality or disclosure of information in order to avoid damage to third parties.

freeborn women in ancient rome were citizens (cives), but could not vote or hold political office. because of their limited public role, women are named less frequently than men by roman historians. but while roman women held no direct political power, those from wealthy or powerful families could and did exert influence through private negotiations. exceptional women who left an undeniable mark on history range from lucretia and claudia quinta, whose stories took on mythic significance; fierce republican-era women such as cornelia, mother of the gracchi, and fulvia, who commanded an army and issued coins bearing her image; women of the julio-claudian dynasty, most prominently livia (58 bc-ad 29), who contributed to the formation of imperial mores; and the empress helena (c.250–330 ad), a driving force in promoting christianity.

women in the ancient greek world had few rights in comparison to male citizens. unable to vote, own land, or inherit, a woman’s place was in the home and her purpose in life was the rearing of children. this, though, is a general description, and when considering the role of women in ancient greece one should remember that information regarding specific city-states is often lacking, is almost always from male authors, and only in athens can their status and role be described in any great detail. neither are we sure of the practical and everyday application of the rules and laws that have survived from antiquity. we do know that spartan women were treated somewhat differently than in other states. for example, they had to do physical training like men, were permitted to own land, and could drink wine.

an important point to remember about correlation is that while there is a _statistical_ relationship correlation does not equal _causation_

the first answer is: statistical

the second answer is: causation