Which best describes a historical interpretation?

The option that best describes a historical interpretation is C. An explanation for why a past event happened.

Explanation:

Historical interpretation involves evaluating what happened about some event or issue in the past and providing an explanation that involves analysis and description. Historians typically use either primary or firsthand sources or secondhand sources that give more context or details about an event. Historians are often interested in understanding the sequence of events in some process or historical outcome and determining the effects through time.

for many centuries there were important factors which the economies of the muslim empires developed increasingly. they applied economic procedures in production, investment, finance, taxation and property. they used to tax certain goods (for example: harvest), they charged interest on money lent, they signed contracts with merchants; they relied on a common currency, and they used checks as well as promissory notes. with the money collected by means of taxation, the government provided the needy with an income. in addition, trading networks covered huge distances, so far regions started to have contact and exchange goods. this trade network covered areas of asia, africa and europe.

sir frederic attributed inaccuracies to schemas. memory reconstruction is one part actual events and one part personal schema, which can result in inaccuracies when memories are reconstructed.