While mr. lindsey was explaining the social studies assignment, missy was finishing homework due for her next class. when the class began the assignment, missy didn't know what to do. based on our understanding of the human memory model, missy was lost because:
a. her perception of the activity was different from that of the other students.
b. she did not pay attention to the instructions that were given.
c. the instructions for the assignment were out of context.
d. the instructions were not transferred from working to long-term memory.

B

Explanation: she did not pay attention to the instructions that has vital information for the assignment. Mr Lindsey had to explain the social studies assignment because if he didn't there is a probability that students might be lost just like Missy .

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.