Asituation in which one side of an economic relationship takes undesirable or costly actions that the other side of the relationship cannot observe is called

moral hazard

Explanation:

Moral hazard appears in markets with asymmetric information. It corresponds to an opportunistic behavior where one of the sides seeks its own benefit at the expense of the other which is being unable to observe their behavior. The entity assumes more risks in its investments because the profits will be for them while the losses will be assumed by the other side. Those who suffer the negative part, cannot do anything because there is no perfect information and do not know the exact intentions.

i am confused, what is the question? i can you out if you put it into more depth.

the anti federalists was a movement that was opposed to the creation of a us federal government. although they were not as organized as the federalists, they also had a large group of leaders, especially in state politics.

the statement "now, in a large extended country, it is impossible to have a representation, possessing the sentiments, and of integrity, to declare the minds of the people” represents the concerns of the anti federalists.

they strongly believed that the federalists were representing the interests of aristocratic elements of society at the expense of the majority of ordinary people, who lived in a rural society.

their fear for the creation of a strong federal government and the president’s power of veto in their opinion would create a tyrannical rule that would dominate the people. they defended the importance of restraining the government’s power towards people at any cost.