Thou art too like the spirit of banquo. down! thy crown does sear mine eyeballs. and thy hair, thou other gold-bound brow, is like the first. a third is like the former.—filthy hags! why do you show me this? —a fourth? start, eyes! what, will the line stretch out to th' crack of doom? another yet? a seventh? i'll see no more. and yet the eighth appears who bears a glass which shows me many more, and some i see that two-fold balls and treble scepters carry. horrible sight! now i see 'tis true, for the blood-boltered banquo smiles upon me, and points at them for his.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.

answer; /// all of the above;