Minami, who comes from a collectivist culture, and jason, who comes from an individualist culture, are working together on a class project.

as they work together, they need to consider some generalizations regarding their cultural orientations toward conflict, such as which of the following?
a) minami may tend to disagree with statements that might violate her individual norms.
b) jason may tend to disagree with statements that violate group values.
c) jason may tend to disagree with statements that violate individual norms.
d) minami may tend to disagree with statements that violate her personal values

Research and review one of the following cases: 1. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc. 2. young vs ups 3. vance vs ball state university after you have thought through and understand the case answer the following: 1. explain the facts of the case leading to the dispute. 2. define and show understanding of each of the terms assigned to your case. break the laws into components where necessary. eeoc vs abercrombie and fitch inc: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) disparate treatment discrimination, 4)disparate impact discrimination vance vs ball state university: 1) eeoc, 2) title vii, 3) hostile work environment, 4) a supervisor for title vii purposes young vs ups: 1) title vii, 2) pregnancy discrimination act, 3)american's with disabilities act, 4) reasonable accommodation 3.how do the above concepts come into play in the case? 4. what rule of law came from the case? what did the court decide? 5. based on your understanding of employment law was the ruling correct? explain using a legal principle.