Which statement would most likely be made as an opponent of the supreme court decision in angle versus vitale

People should not have to restrict their exercise of free religion just because they happen to be in school.

Option: (A)

Explanation:

The Engel vs Vitale was a case in the Supreme Court which ruled on June 25, 1962, that any form of voluntary prayer in public schools is prohibited as it violated the Constitution’s First Amendment which prohibited the state establishment of religion. Thus, an opponent of this decision has to say that the voluntary prayer should be allowed and from the options, the only one that can be said by an opponent would be the first option. If the opponent says that a person should be able to profess his faith through prayer, and should not be restricted just because he or she belongs to a school prohibiting him from practicing his faith, will be just wrong, will be a completely fair point on part of the opponent.