In experiments that compare all-mental practice to all-physical practice and no practice conditions, results typically show that participants in the all-mental practice condition learn the skill:

B. not as well as those in the all-physical practice condition but better than those in the no practice condition.

Explanation:

The reason behind this answer that the all-physical practice condition participants learn skills better than all-mental practice condition who learn better than the no practice condition participant is because of the ability to create a perspective by handling the objects involved in the tasks. Of course here, the type of the task also matters but the hands on approach helps the learner in most cases. On the other hand, the all-mental practice condition participants might do well in tasks related to mental capacity only but in general does not perform better than all-physical practice condition.

giant impact theory - the moon was formed from the collision between earth and another mars-sized body.

colliding planetesimals hypothesis - the moon was formed from the same cloud of material as earth.

capture hypothesis - the moon was locked into orbit by earths gravity as it was passing by it.

accretion hypothesis - the moon was formed from collisions and combining of planetesimals.

i think this is right, if not and you know better let me know.

1. senate

2.there is no diagram

3.education