Avoidance is ineffective as a conflict resolution strategy because

a. the two sides to a conflict are more concerned about winning the battle than cooperating.
b. the weaker party who gives in might look for ways to get back at the stronger party in the future.
c. it escalates levels of conflict as each party tries to outmaneuver the other.
d. it allows only one party to achieve its goals.
e. it does not address the real source of disagreement.

e. it does not address the real source of disagreement.                        

Explanation:

      A conflict is a disagreement or clash of interest where people have different views on a topic and do not agree with each others opinion. People having conflict generally end up with a quarrel. Conflict is uncomfortable in both professional and personal context. Handling conflict effectively is highly productive. There are various strategies and ways to resolve conflicts.

         However avoiding conflict is not an effective way to handle conflicts or to resolve it. Avoiding conflicts will fester as time passes and it have a tendency to grow. Avoiding a conflict will not help in resolving the conflict on its own. Doing this there is always a fear of reappearing the conflict in inappropriate moments.

Thus the correct option is (e).

the first two-party system consisted of the federalist party, who supported the ratification of the constitution, and the democratic-republican party or the anti-administration party (anti-federalists), who opposed the powerful central government, among others, that the constitution established when it took effect in

it's the under parts of the car