In consideration of what is morally and ethically righteous in a fair, equitable, and wealthy society, as well as the definition of social justice (as found in the introduction of the course), what do you believe should be canada's role in the syrian crisis?

what are the specific benefits for canada if we accept many syrian refugees (or refugees in general from any country, for that matter), and what can they do for us, to our country? why do we need them just as much as they need canada? be specific.

what are the consequences if canada and other countries do not act on this?

what solutions would you propose to this issue (the syrian, or the issue of canada accepting mass quantities of refugees from any war torn conflict)?

i need an essay

Please check explanation.

Explanation:

Undoubtedly, Canada is a wealthy country but it lacks the human population. And one needs to understand the morally and ethically righteous in a fair, equitable and wealthy society like Canada. Canada needs true people, who are skilled no matter in what but must be fruitful? However, they love IT and CS professionals. Also, they love hard workers, and Syria is a land of God. It is full of talent, and it would not be a bad idea if Canada allows a good number of them to take Canadian citizenship, and settle in Canada to work and live in peace and harmony. Hence, Canada’s role is not just to provide wealth to Syria, but also citizenship to a maximum number of refugees from Syria.

Also, we all know that Syrians are quite good at talent, and if they come to live in Canada, then they are going to work hard and make Canada proud. They can win Gold in the Olympics, and they are Engineers and Doctors as well. Many of them are known for their art and craft as well. And a lot of them can work in petroleum refineries. And we should not forget that Canada has loads of Petroleum refineries. But many of them have been closed due to health hazards. Syrians might bring with them some solutions for those refineries. And they are talented enough to accomplish this. However, it's not an easy task but many of them know a lot about petroleum, being a part of the Arab World.

They need Canada, and Canada needs them. They need shelter and food, and Canada needs work from them.

However, if countries like Canada and various others who can allow a good number of refugees to live in their country do not react then probably it will be the defeat of humanity. People will keep suffering and dying in Syria. And the world will keep crying. And the solution is straightforward, that Canada should allow a maximum number of citizenship to the maximum number of Syrians, and till the number possible. The whole world hence is looking towards Canada with eyes wide open. Tudor must come to some conclusion soon.

. austria-hungary began seizing british colonies in africa.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.