Social Studies, 07.01.2020 01:31 cxttiemsp021

People who suffer partial paralysis will sometimes obstinately claim they can move a paralyzed limb if they have suffered damage to the:

a. right cerebral hemisphere.
b. parasympathetic nervous system
c. left cerebral hemisphere.
d. sympathetic nervous system.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Another question on Social Studies

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 00:30

Give three examples of distinctive characteristics of conformity to typical american culture

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 07:30

How is the city of savannah related to the union strategy of a full blockade of confederate ports? a) savannah was the last port needed to be secured in order to totally blockade the coast of georgia. b) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the tennessee river. c) savannah was the least significant city in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing atlanta and capturing the chattahoochee river. d) savannah was the most significant port in georgia, and the union strategy centered on securing bases at savannah and the outlying islands to fully blockade georgia.

Answers: 1

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 15:00

Norman jones, an economic historian at the university of utah, has described the views of the ancient greek philosopher aristotle on interest: aristotle defined money as a good that was consumed by use. unlike houses and fields, which are not destroyed by use, money must be spent to be used. there- fore, as we cannot rent food, so we cannot rent money. moreover, money does not reproduce. a house or a flock can produce new value by use, so it is not unreasonable to ask for a return on their use. money, being barren, should not, therefore, be expected to produce excess value. thus, interest is unnatural. what did aristotle mean in arguing that money is â€śbarrenâ€ť? why would money being barren mean that lenders should not charge interest on loans? do you agree with aristotleâ€™s reasoning? briefly explain.

Answers: 2

Answer

Social Studies, 23.06.2019 18:00

Ms. garcia and ms. ming are both sixth-grade english teachers. ms. garcia, a new teacher at the school, has additional certification in gifted education. ms. ming has been a certified english teacher for a number of years. ms. ming has been overheard in the faculty lounge making negative comments about ms. garcia's professional abilities and personal character. mr. daniels, the sixth-grade history teacher, has heard ms. ming making negative comments about ms. garcia on more than one occasion and he knows that these comments are false. he also knows that ms. ming has been angry that ms. garcia was asked to teach the advanced english class. this is a class ms. ming had expressed a desire to teach. he believes this contributes to her negativity toward ms. garcia. what should he do? * a. mr. daniels should do nothing because he is not directly involved in the disagreement. b. mr. daniels should discuss the situation with the principal because ms. ming is in direct violation of the code of ethics. c. mr. daniels should speak ms. ming and ask her to stop talking about ms. garcia. d. mr. daniels should talk to ms. garcia about letting ms. ming teach the class since she has seniority.

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

People who suffer partial paralysis will sometimes obstinately claim they can move a paralyzed limb...

Questions