Which relational dialectic is causing tension in the following scenario?

ellen and bill have been married for five years. on friday night once a month, they rent a movie and make dinner together. bill enjoys the activity most of the time, but it's starting to feel a bit boring.

autonomy-connection
novelty-predictability
openness-privacy

Novelty-predictability

Explanation:

In relationships, dialectical tensions can lead to difficulties in the interaction between partners. When it comes to a healthy relationship, both partners should be able to find a balance to fulfill each other’s needs.

Novelty-predictability refers to a type of tension that occurs when one partner seeks a level of novelty and excitement in the relationship while the other prefers a routine or predictable activities.

In this case, Ellen seems to enjoy the predictability of the relationship, that is, renting a movie and watching a film once a month; whereas Bill's boredom could mean that he is seeking for more novelty and excitement which could be achieved by changing the routine. This leads to the tension of novelty vs predictability in their relationship.

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.