subject
Social Studies, 21.01.2020 20:31 creeconnell1

If people wrinkle their noses in disgust when presented with a strange-looking food, they are likely to experience an increasingly intense emotional aversion to the food. this best illustrates thea. cannon-bard theory. b. relative deprivation principle. c. feel-good, do-good phenomenon. d. facial feedback effect.

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 00:00
Did the writers of the declaration of independence accomplish their goals (did we get our independence and the new government we wrote about)?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 17:20
Pick a famous politician, business leader, or celebrity who has been arrested recently. what crime did he or she allegedly commit? who was the victim? what factors best explain how this person might be punished if convicted? if the person was recently tried in what was the outcome? do you agree or disagree and why?
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 02:30
What caused the settlement of more african americans in the mississippi alluvial plain region than in the ozark mountains point)
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
If people wrinkle their noses in disgust when presented with a strange-looking food, they are likely...
Questions
question
Social Studies, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Law, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Mathematics, 06.09.2020 05:01
question
Biology, 06.09.2020 05:01
Questions on the website: 13722363