Look at the following cause-and-effect chart, showing events from the case of mapp v. ohio (1961). an arrow points from a box labeled, officers illegally searched dollree mapp's home, to a box labeled, mapp was convicted of a crime. what happened to dollree mapp after her case went to the supreme court?

The answer is B

Explanation:

Case: A landmark Supreme Court case in which appellant Dollree Mapp, who was convicted for possession of obscene materials after an admittedly illegal search of her home, appealed her conviction on the basis of freedom of expression. The questions before the court were 1) Were the confiscated materials protected by the First Amendment? and 2) May evidence obtained through a search in violation of the Fourth Amendment be admitted in a state criminal proceeding?

Conclusion: The court ignored the First Amendment issue and declared that "all evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Constitution is, by the Fourth Amendment, inadmissible in a state court." Ultimately, this decision extended the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence to all levels of the government.

"choosing is refusing" means individuals face an opportunity cost with each decision they make. economists state that every decision involves trade-offs. opportunity cost is the least desirable alternative given up as a result of a decision.