While your mom is lecturing you about cleaning your room, you lose concentration. then, suddenly you hear the significant words, "no car keys." when she asks, "are you listening to me? " you are able to repeat the last few things she said before mentioning car keys. which of the following best explains this phenomenon? a. because you have heard the same lecture many times, rehearsal has caused it to be stored in long-termmemory. b. words stored in echoic memory will last for 3 to 4 seconds, so you can still recall her words. c. what your mom said at the beginning and end of her lecture will be recalled because of the serial positioneffect. d. because losing driving privileges is an emotional event, her words create a flashbulb memory. e. hearing the words "car keys" leads to the priming of specific memories.

B. Words stored in echoic memory will last for 3 to 4 seconds, so you can still recall her words.

Explanation:

We have different types of memory, one of those types of memory is echoic memory.

This memory is a type of sensory memory that register sounds, when we first hear something, the sound is stored in this memory so it can be processed. The stimuli last about 3 to 4 seconds in the echoic memory (that's why sometimes we can hear something after it was said even if we're not paying attention)

In this example, your mom is lecturing you and you lose concentration, when she asks you if you're listening and you are able to repeat the last few things she said. We can see that this is an effect of the echoic memory, that has stored the last 3-4 seconds of your mom's lecture and you can repeat this even if you were not paying attention.

aristocracy, timocracy, oligarchy, democracy, theocracy and tyranny

explanation:

the answer is the petition of right.

explanation:

offer to of right, real demand of attesting a benefit against the english crown, the most remarkable point of reference being the petition of right of 1628, which parliament sent to charles i fussing of a movement of oversteps of law. the term also implied the framework (invalidated in 1947) by which a subject could sue the crown.   taking a gander at the frameworks used by maria amidu to make a standard in 2015 commending the 1628 petition of right, which was sent to charles i by the english parliament. at uniquely based law the crown, or the sovereign in his official cutoff, couldn't be sued in the ruler's courts. since the ruler was, really, the superior ace of those courts, coordinating value in them between his subjects, he was not subject to their ward. therefore it transformed into a preparation, at whatever point a subject's certified or individual property had come into the responsibility for ruler or his specialists without legitimate perfect, for the subject to engage the master in chamber for its recovery.