An airport authority resolution declared the central terminal area "not open for first amendment activities." the resolution was unconstitutional under the first amendment

Overbreadth Doctrine

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that the resolution was unconstitutional under the First Amendment Overbreadth Doctrine. This doctrine protects against prohibiting behavior that is guaranteed by the constitution, such as freedom of speech. The airport making a "First Amendment-Free Zone" was unconstitutional under this doctrine.

the boundarys like convergent divergent and transform it causes subduction

i think the answer is true : ))