We have discussed many ways of evaluating research or research-based claims. which one of the following descriptions is the least reasonable approach? a. one way to approach evaluating research claims is to take it at face value based on a popular press article. this is because findings in the popular press are always critically based on scientific journals and wouldn't be published without a reason. b. one way to approach evaluating research claims is to conduct your own research. most individuals who are posing questions already have knowledge relevant to conducting research, it is often inexpensive, and conducting your own research is the most directly answers the question you are interested in. c. one way to approach evaluating research claims is to read empirical articles. although you may find contradictions, these are findings by experts who are trained in conducting research. d. one way to approach evaluating research claims is to look at similar findings related to the original research questions you had in mind, because this often leads to finding replications that suggest that the claims are strong.

critically based on scientific journals and wouldn't be published without a reason.B. One way to approach evaluating research claims is to conduct your own research. Most individuals who are posing questions already have knowledge relevant to conducting research, it is often inexpensive, and conducting your own research is the most directly answers the question you are interested in.

Explanation:

Conducting your own research is the least reasonable approach. Why?

Not all reaseach call be easily replicated since some may be complex and very expensive rightly contradicting the statement here that research isn't expensive. Also conducting your own research does not however guarantee the genuinity of the result, every research is prone to errors or mistakes. Lastly, not all individuals that pose questions to a research have the requisite knowledge to conduct that research.

france

hope this !

glass wants to live in a world of super heroes and villains. he have lived all his life trying to be responsible for the creating the origin story of a super hero; he schemed and caused many incidents (many of them fatal) hoping that someday someone with superpowers would show up and save the day.

he knew himself very much. he saw himself as a villain of a real-life super hero story. he was aware of his strengths (more than smart enough for being manipulative and scheming) and weaknesses (having fragile bones and having to rely on his mind to succeed).