Why would maintaining control of the hudson river be a good military strategy? write your response in one to two complete sentences.

pls

It was an important military strategy to control the Hudson river.

Explanation:

British Army wanted to divide rest of the states from New England. It would isolate New England this way.  

New England was the center of the rebellion. Three British armies marched from "New York City, Montreal and Fort Oswego" and met in Albany. Then they seized Hudson River. It formed a natural obstruction along the western side of New England. The British were then able to move South and defeat the Southern colonies.

Thus, it was a very important and good military strategy.

would it be plagiarism to copy and paste off of here? ?

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.