subject
Social Studies, 10.02.2020 23:32 jonestrishy4803

Which of the following statements describe the living bridges?
i. They were made to avoid the destruction of summer monsoons.
ii. They take 10 to 15 years to create.
iii. They are grown rather than built.
A. i. only
B. i. and ii. only
C. i. and iii. only
D. ii. and iii. only

ansver
Answers: 1

Another question on Social Studies

question
Social Studies, 22.06.2019 12:00
No creative answers only the right onesanswer asapif you learned oratory, what could you do? a. give good speeches b. understand the law c. make fun of peopled. race chariots
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 01:30
When the power of authority is placed in the hands of the wealthy and influential citizens this is known as a(n) i can not do it
Answers: 1
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 05:30
Athief was passing by a house under construction when he noticed that the ladder being used by workers on the roof had copper braces supporting the rungs. after making sure that the workers on the roof could not see him, the thief used pliers that he had in his pocket to remove all of the copper braces that he could reach from the ground. a short time later, a worker climbed down the ladder and it collapsed. he fell to the ground and severely injured his back. the thief was apprehended a few hours later trying to sell the copper for scrap. a statute in the jurisdiction makes it a felony for "maliciously causing serious physical injury to another." the thief was charged with malicious injury under the statute and was also charged with larceny. after a jury trial in which the above facts were presented, he was convicted of both charges. if he appeals the conviction for the malicious injury charge on grounds of insufficient evidence, how should the court rule? a affirm the conviction, because the thief was engaged in criminal conduct at the time of the act that resulted in the injury. b affirm the conviction, because the jury could have found that the thief acted with malice. c reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief intended to injure anyone. d reverse the conviction, because there was no evidence that the thief bore any malice towards the workers on the roof.
Answers: 2
question
Social Studies, 23.06.2019 09:40
I'm in a few lessons on eastern europe and i need me don't leave me hanging. : {
Answers: 2
You know the right answer?
Which of the following statements describe the living bridges?
i. They were made to avoid the...
Questions
question
History, 24.02.2021 22:20
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 22:20
question
Mathematics, 24.02.2021 22:20
Questions on the website: 13722362