Marilyn brought her $300 silk dress to University Dry Cleaners to be cleaned. On the back of the ticket she received in exchange for the dress was written, "Liability limited to ten times the cost of cleaning." Marilyn's dress was lost and University now claims it owes her only $56.50, ten times the cost of cleaning. Is that true?
Question 7 options:

No, because the limitation is unconscionable.

No, because the cleaners is not a common carrier.

No, because Marilyn is not a bailor.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

No, because the limitation was not communicated to her.

Explanation:

Based on the information provided within the question it can be said that this is not true because the limitation was not communicated to her. Since she walked into a store and asked to have her dress cleaned, the individual at the front desk should have explicitly mentioned the pricing and policy to her so that she knew what she was accepting by leaving her dress at the store. Since they did not do this then they must pay her the $300 that the dress is worth.

concurrent jurisdiction is the ability to exercise judicial review by different courts at the same time, within the same territory, and over the same subject matter. for instance, a domestic violence matter may be heard in either a general civil court or a family court in the same county. whichever court actually exercises its jurisdiction first will do so exclusively.

the earthquake in haiti was a magnitude of 7.0 according to the u.s geological survey yet the smaller earthquake in haiti killed more than 200,000 and left more than 1.2 million people homeless. the chile earthquake was a magnitude of 8.8 and 500 times more stronger but chile's earthquake only injured 712 people.