Ted and Janet were married and owned a piece of jungle property in a tenancy by the entirety. When Janet died, her will left of all her real property to T. J., their adult son. T. J. claims he is the sole owner of the jungle property. Ted objects and files a lawsuit for sole ownership of the jungle property.

Full question :

Ted and Janet were married and owned a piece of jungle property in a tenancy by the entirety. When Janet died, her will left of all her real property to T.J., their adult son. T.J. claims he is the sole owner of the jungle property. Ted objects and files a lawsuit for sole ownership of the jungle property.

Ted will win

Explanation:

This is case of joint tenancy. Ted and Janet owned the property and had equal rights to it. Janet under this legal arrangement can not transfer ownership(whether by will or even inheritance) to another individual. And so Ted will win because he has rights of survivorship to the property under the Joint tenancy arrangement and he is the surviving spouse. Ted will get the title to the entire property.

question 1: the kuwaiti government announced us$1.5 million in aid for rohingya refugees.they pointed out that it was imperative to take immediate and concrete steps to ramp up pressure on myanmar to put an end to the violence.and said   that they r just shameful

question 2: the rohingyas were not aloud to be seen as people in myanmar.in the last few years, before the latest crisis, thousands of rohingya were making perilous journeys out of myanmar to escape communal violence or alleged abuses by the security forces.the latest exodus began on 25 august 2017 after rohingya arsa militants launched deadly attacks on more than 30 police posts.rohingyas arriving in an area known as cox's bazaar - a district in bangladesh - say they fled after troops, backed by local buddhist mobs, responded by burning their villages and attacking and killing civilians.